Furrow Forms

Furrow Forms vs Forminit

[ forminit.com · “Form handling without the backend work” (formerly Getform) · verified 2026-08-20 ]

Forminit — the product formerly known as Getform (getform.io now redirects there) — is an established headless form backend with generous file uploads, broad integrations, and the best-documented webhook delivery in its class: Svix-style signed payloads with automatic retries. The comparison below focuses on programmatic control and how far an AI agent can get without a human.

The short answer

Furrow Forms is the better choice for API-first and agent-driven teams: forms, sites, and accounts are creatable via API and MCP, with settings inherited across a whole site. Forminit is the better choice when you need Zapier-scale integrations from a long-running product.

Furrow Forms — best for

Agent-driven setup, agencies with many sites, unlimited forms on every tier, free-tier API access

Forminit — best for

Zapier and native integrations, teams migrating from Getform

Feature by feature

Furrow Forms and Forminit, side by side

Capability comparison between Furrow Forms and Forminit
CapabilityFurrow FormsForminit
Create & configure forms via APIyes

Full CRUD over REST + MCP; bootstrap_site provisions a whole site’s forms in one call

no

The REST API (Pro+) submits forms and lists submissions — no form creation or configuration

MCP serveryes

26 tools over streamable HTTP or stdio — full lifecycle, from account registration to reading submissions and Stripe billing links

no

“Build with AI” prompt templates generate frontend code only

Agent cold-start (account via API)yes

Agents register accounts via GET/POST /api/register; the human reads one email code

no

Browser signup only

Site-level settings, inherited by formsyes

Security and routing configured once per website; every form inherits

no

Per-form configuration

Signed webhooks with retries + logyes

HMAC-SHA256 signed, retried with backoff, logged, testable — all tiers

partial

Genuinely good: HMAC-signed (Svix-style) with automatic backoff retries — but gated to Pro ($19/mo)

Spam protectionyes

Honeypot + timing field + Turnstile + domain allowlist + rate limits + server-side filtering, on by default; spam never counts toward quota

yes

Built-in filtering plus Turnstile, reCAPTCHA v3, or hCaptcha

API access on the free tieryes

The whole product on the free tier, volume-capped

no

REST API and webhooks start at Pro ($19/mo)

File uploadsyes

Opt-in per website, inherited by every form; files land in a private per-site inbox (PDF, JPEG, PNG, WebP by default) — emails and webhooks link to it, never to raw file URLs

yes

Up to 25 MB per submission, even on the free tier

Native integrationsno

Signed webhooks are the integration story

yes

Google Sheets, Slack, Discord, Make, Zapier (8,000+ apps)

Unlimited formsyes

On every tier

no

1 form free, 5 on Pro, 15 on Business

Pricing

What a year actually costs

Pricing comparison between Furrow Forms and Forminit
Furrow FormsForminit
Free tier$0 — 100 subs/mo, full API + MCP$0 — 100 subs/mo, 1 form, 100 MB storage
First paid tier$199/yr flat per workspace — 10k subs/mo, unlimited forms & sitesPro $19/mo (~$228/yr) — 5,000 subs/mo, 5 forms
Higher tiersNone — one flat priceBusiness $49/mo, Volume $99/mo
FormsUnlimited on all tiers1 / 5 / 15 / — by tier

A year of Forminit Pro (~$228) costs more than Furrow Pro ($199) and caps you at 5 forms and 5,000 submissions; Furrow is unlimited forms and 10,000 submissions, with the API included from $0.

Honest trade-offs

Where each one wins

Where Forminit wins

  • [ + ]25 MB per submission of uploads delivered as email attachments, even on the free tier
  • [ + ]Signed webhooks with automatic retries (the strongest delivery story among classic backends)
  • [ + ]Zapier integration reaching 8,000+ apps, plus Sheets, Slack, Discord, Make
  • [ + ]Polished AI-prompt onboarding for ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, v0, and friends

Where Furrow Forms wins

  • [ + ]A real management surface: create and configure clients, sites, and forms over REST + MCP — Forminit’s API cannot create a form
  • [ + ]Agent cold-start: a new account can be provisioned from a conversation
  • [ + ]Site-level settings inheritance across unlimited forms (Forminit: 1 free / 5 Pro)
  • [ + ]Signed, retried webhooks on every tier — theirs are Pro-gated
  • [ + ]Full API access at $0; theirs starts at $19/mo and is read-only

FAQ

Furrow Forms vs Forminit, answered

Is Furrow Forms a good Getform / Forminit alternative?

Yes for developers and agencies who want forms managed programmatically or by AI agents: Furrow Forms adds a management API, MCP server, agent cold-start, and site-level settings inheritance. Forminit is the stronger pick if Zapier-scale integrations are essential.

What happened to Getform?

Getform rebranded to Forminit — getform.io now redirects to forminit.com. The product continues with the same form-backend model: dashboard-created forms, endpoint submission, integrations, and a submissions-focused REST API on paid plans.

Can AI agents manage forms in Forminit?

No. Forminit publishes AI prompt templates that generate frontend form code pointing at its endpoints, but there is no MCP server and its API cannot create or configure forms. Furrow Forms exposes its entire control plane to agents, including account registration.

[ verified against forminit.com on 2026-08-20 · re-checked monthly · corrections welcome — /contact ]

Try the difference. Or have your agent try it.

paste this into your agent

Fetch furrowforms.com/ai and set up forms for this site.

Setup for agents →