Where Formcarry wins
- [ + ]Stripe integration — collect payments through a form, unusual in this category
- [ + ]Backend field-validation rules configured in the dashboard
- [ + ]Team roles and permissions at low price points
Furrow Forms vs Formcarry
[ formcarry.com · “The form backend that sends submissions to your inbox” · verified 2026-08-20 ]
Formcarry is a straightforward form backend with a few uncommon features at its price point: backend field-validation rules, team roles, and Stripe payment collection through forms. Its API can create and delete forms, though not list or update them. The comparison below focuses on programmatic depth and delivery guarantees.
The short answer
Furrow Forms is the better choice for agent-driven and multi-site work: full CRUD over REST and MCP, agent cold-start, settings inheritance, and signed webhooks. Formcarry is the better choice if you want Stripe payments through a form, dashboard-defined validation rules, or team seats on a small budget.
Furrow Forms — best for
AI agents, agencies, unlimited free forms, verified webhook delivery
Formcarry — best for
Stripe payment forms, backend validation rules, small teams on Starter pricing
Feature by feature
Furrow Forms and Formcarry, side by side
| Capability | Furrow Forms | Formcarry |
|---|---|---|
| Create & configure forms via API | yes Full CRUD over REST + MCP; bootstrap_site provisions a whole site’s forms in one call | partial API can create and delete forms — but not list, read, or update them |
| MCP server | yes 26 tools over streamable HTTP or stdio — full lifecycle, from account registration to reading submissions and Stripe billing links | no No agent surface |
| Agent cold-start (account via API) | yes Agents register accounts via GET/POST /api/register; the human reads one email code | no Browser signup only |
| Site-level settings, inherited by forms | yes Security and routing configured once per website; every form inherits | no Per-form configuration |
| Signed webhooks with retries + log | yes HMAC-SHA256 signed, retried with backoff, logged, testable — all tiers | no Webhooks advertised, but signing and retry behavior are undocumented |
| Spam protection | yes Honeypot + timing field + Turnstile + domain allowlist + rate limits + server-side filtering, on by default; spam never counts toward quota | partial Proprietary filter + honeypot + reCAPTCHA; on the free plan spam counts toward your 50-submission cap |
| API access on the free tier | yes The whole product on the free tier, volume-capped | no Free plan is 1 form / 50 submissions; API features sit on paid tiers |
| File uploads | yes Opt-in per website, inherited by every form; files land in a private per-site inbox (PDF, JPEG, PNG, WebP by default) — emails and webhooks link to it, never to raw file URLs | yes 10 MB per file on paid plans, 1–30 GB storage by tier |
| Native integrations | no Signed webhooks are the integration story | yes Zapier (3,000+ apps) and Stripe payment collection |
| Unlimited forms | yes On every tier | no 1 form free; unlimited from Starter ($6/mo) |
Pricing
What a year actually costs
| Furrow Forms | Formcarry | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | $0 — 100 subs/mo, full API + MCP | $0 — 1 form, 50 subs/mo (spam included in the count) |
| First paid tier | $199/yr flat per workspace — 10k subs/mo, unlimited forms & sites | Starter $6/mo ($60/yr) — 500 subs/mo, unlimited forms |
| Mid tier | None — one flat price | Basic $19/mo, Premium $99/mo (30k subs) |
Formcarry’s Starter is cheaper in absolute terms. Furrow’s free tier already includes unlimited forms and the full API/MCP surface — Formcarry’s free tier is one form, and spam submissions consume its cap.
Honest trade-offs
Where each one wins
Where Furrow Forms wins
- [ + ]Full form CRUD over REST and MCP; Formcarry’s API can only create and delete
- [ + ]Agent cold-start and MCP — no agent surface exists there
- [ + ]Settings cascade across a site; unlimited forms on the free tier
- [ + ]Signed, retried, logged, testable webhooks; theirs are undocumented
- [ + ]Caught spam is quarantined with no email or webhook — and never counts toward your volume
FAQ
Furrow Forms vs Formcarry, answered
Is Furrow Forms a good Formcarry alternative?
Yes for API-first and agent-driven teams: Furrow Forms offers full programmatic control, MCP, cold-start, settings inheritance, and verified webhook delivery. Formcarry is the stronger pick if you specifically want Stripe payment forms or dashboard validation rules.
Can you create Formcarry forms via API?
Partially. Formcarry’s API supports creating and deleting forms but not listing, reading, or updating them, and there is no MCP server. Furrow Forms supports the full lifecycle over both REST and MCP, on the free tier.
How do the free tiers compare?
Formcarry: 1 form, 50 submissions/month, with spam counting toward the cap. Furrow Forms: unlimited forms, 100 submissions/month, full API and MCP access, and honeypot-caught spam is dropped before it is ever stored or counted.
[ verified against formcarry.com on 2026-08-20 · re-checked monthly · corrections welcome — /contact ]
Try the difference. Or have your agent try it.
paste this into your agent
Fetch furrowforms.com/ai and set up forms for this site.